MONTHLY NEWSLETTER:
Subscribe and join our community of curious HR Professionals and Managers.
Latest Article
Categories
Quick Links
Applauz Blog
Published: February 26, 2024
8 min read
By: Anouare Abdou
The traditional performance review is outdated. Embrace the 360 performance review instead – here’s what it is and how to conduct one.
Companies like Accenture, Deloitte, Microsoft and Netflix have ditched annual reviews. Not only do most employees find performance reviews ineffective, but they also don’t feel like they help them do their best work.
A CEB study revealed that a staggering 95% of employees were dissatisfied with their organization’s appraisal process. And only 2 in 10 employees strongly agree that their performance is managed in a way that motivates them to do outstanding work, according to Gallup.
That’s because annual appraisals can feel forced. They often don’t paint an accurate picture of an employee’s performance and skimp on career development opportunities. They can also be heavily influenced by a manager’s personal biases. Finally, they don’t take into account peer feedback – a missed opportunity when it comes to gathering insights that will help an employee develop their strengths.
Enter the 360 performance review, a performance management process that allows employees to get feedback from a variety of sources, as well as evaluate themselves.
A 360 performance review – which is sometimes also referred to as 360 feedback or multi-directional feedback – involves soliciting feedback about an employee’s contributions and skills from different people at different levels of the organization.
Beyond an employee’s manager, this includes peers, reporting staff, and other managers – typically a range of 6 to 12 people for best results. It’s important to note that the feedback is anonymous. The process usually also involves a self-evaluation.
Some organizations use fancy tech platforms to gather and organize feedback throughout the year. Others conduct 360 reviews with simple online forms. In most cases, the employee’s manager gathers the feedback and shares it in a one-on-one meeting.
The biggest difference between a 360 review versus a traditional performance review is that instead of managers providing top-down feedback, the employee gets to receive feedback from a variety of coworkers.
Also, while traditional reviews are more focused on evaluating whether an employee has done their job well, multi-directional feedback is more focused on the impact that the employee has on the people they work with. Ultimately, the goal is to empower the employee with information that will facilitate their professional development.
From enhanced objectivity to better performance, there are several benefits to embracing 360 performance reviews.
One of the biggest benefits of 360 performance reviews is the inclusion of peer feedback. Research conducted by Gartner showed that peer feedback can boost employee performance by as much as 14%.
“As work becomes more interdependent and managers have less direct visibility into the day-to-day of their teams, high-quality peer input has become an essential part of effective performance feedback,”
- Jessica Knight, Research Director at Gartner
An employee recognition platform like Applauz can help you foster peer feedback on a regular basis as a first step towards 360 reviews.
Getting input from multiple sources also paints a more comprehensive picture of an employee’s performance. This has multiple benefits. One of the most salient ones is that it allows managers to evaluate how an employee is doing in a more objective way.
Managers just don’t have that much visibility into what’s going on – and they don’t experience the full impact of an employee’s contributions on a day-in-day-out basis. This is especially true when it comes to remote and hybrid workers.
A 360 performance review provides a more accurate way to assess performance, which then enables managers to offer personalized training opportunities and career advancement options to their reports.
Additionally, this type of feedback process helps employees learn and improve. It fosters self-awareness and brings blind spots to light. It emphasizes both strengths and areas of improvement. Simply put, it’s more constructive.
When you only get feedback from your boss, you’re reliant on their ability to assess you properly and convey helpful insights. If their skills are lacking on that front, you’re left scratching your head.
On the other hand, if multiple people point out something specific, like the fact that you excel at making people feel safe in your presence, you can take this insight and use it to develop yourself further. Perhaps it’s a strength you never even considered before because it comes so naturally, but now you're going to lean into it.
Have you heard of the recency bias? It’s a cognitive phenomenon that has people putting more weight on recent events and information. When it comes to a performance review, this can look like evaluating an employee favorably or negatively based on their latest project instead of considering their overall performance throughout the year.
Other workplace biases involve internalized notions about race, gender, and age. With a 360 review, there are still possible individual biases involved, but their impact is reduced by the fact you’re soliciting diverse perspectives.
Conducting 360 performance reviews sends a powerful message: Feedback matters here, and we’re all responsible for it. This encourages team members to support each other in their growth and opens the lines of communication. As a result, collaboration thrives and employee engagement goes up.
Ready to conduct 360 performance reviews with your team? Here are some tips to do it successfully.
Start with walking your team through the process and goals. Make sure everyone understands the purpose of the feedback exercise: Supporting professional development and team performance. And, of course, explain how the feedback will be used, as this will add context in clarity into why these are so important, and some guidance on what to focus on.
Choosing the right participants is key. According to Gartner, possible sources should include four types of coworkers:
People will be more likely to share honest feedback if they know that the information provided will remain confidential and anonymous. Ensuring anonymity is, therefore, key – and you want to make sure the tools that you use to conduct the process can guarantee it.
Good feedback should be specific and include several examples. From providing guidelines to hosting workshops with a consultant, and offering training and guidance to help employees master the art of giving helpful feedback.
Consistency in the type of feedback across participants matters. Standardizing the process through a specific set of questions that cover relevant competencies, skills, and behaviors should do the trick. It’s OK to have a couple of different templates based on the type of position involved.
Frame the feedback as an opportunity for growth and development and encourage people to notice and leverage their strengths through the 360 review process. Coworkers will feel more comfortable giving each other feedback – and receiving feedback from each other – when they know that the information will be used in positive ways instead of criticism.
Organize feedback sessions where employees can have a platform to discuss the feedback that they received with their manager. Consider hiring a trained facilitator who can help team members maximize the information received and gain deeper insights into their strengths and areas of improvement.
Use the feedback to devise professional development plans and offer support. Then, follow up regularly to track employees’ progress and address any challenges they may face.
Beyond the tips above, there are a few universal best practices to keep in mind for the best results.
A 360 review process requires a lot of trust – and you can build trust with your team by communicating clearly and transparently. Reiterate the purpose of the exercise and set clear expectations. Keep things fair and standardized.
Finally, address any concerns about anonymity and confidentiality and be available to answer questions and provide guidance.
Asking the right questions is paramount if you want to garner helpful feedback. Gather input from various stakeholders to determine which parameters to base the questions around. Cover different skill categories, from leadership skills to adaptability.
When creating feedback forms, consider different seniority levels and types of positions – people in technical roles, like software developers, may benefit from a specific set of questions.
Acknowledging and celebrating strengths is one of the most important aspects of a successful 360 performance review. This will help employees develop their strengths further. But it’s also important to point out areas of improvement. Balance positivity and constructive feedback with the aim of equipping employees with insights that will help them grow and improve.
The whole point of soliciting this comprehensive feedback is to use it. Make sure that you leverage the information gathered in an actionable way. For example, use what you learn to offer an employee the opportunity to upskill.
Documenting the results of your 360 review and the actions that derive from it is another best practice to keep in mind. This will help set goals, track progress and remain accountable.
You’ll probably have to go through a couple of iterations of your 360 review process before nailing it down. Run an employee survey to get feedback about the process (yes, get feedback about the feedback!). Optimize your approach accordingly.
Since the right questions can make or break a 360 performance review, here are a few examples of great questions to ask.
When asking reports to evaluate a manager, draw inspiration from the questions below:
If you’re wondering whether adopting a 360 review process is the right move for your team, keep in mind that multi-directional feedback can work in a variety of settings and companies of different sizes. Ultimately, this type of approach is most effective in organizations that value feedback because it does require a time and effort investment.
Regardless of whether a 360 performance review is right for you, peer-to-peer and 360 feedback (and recognition) is always a good thing--having a positive impact on both employee engagement and performance. Build a feedback-friendly culture (and ideally use employee recognition software) to reap the enduring rewards of feedback and communication in your organization.
Incorporating Open-Ended Questions into the 360-Degree Feedback process allows respondents to provide more detailed and nuanced insights into an employee's performance. This qualitative feedback can highlight specific strengths and areas for improvement that a simple rating scale might not capture, offering richer, more personalized feedback.
Upward Feedback is a crucial component of the 360-Degree Feedback process, where subordinates evaluate their manager's performance. It promotes a culture of openness, mutual respect, and continuous improvement by providing managers with insight into how their leadership style and decisions impact their team's morale and productivity.
A Rating Scale in 360-Degree Reviews is used to quantify aspects of an employee's performance, typically ranging from poor to excellent. This scale helps standardize feedback, making it easier to identify trends and compare performance across different team members or review periods.
Anonymous Feedback is vital for ensuring honest and constructive feedback. Knowing their responses are confidential, respondents are more likely to provide candid assessments of their colleagues' performance, strengths, and areas for improvement without fear of repercussions.
Feedback is considered actionable when it is specific, measurable, and tied to concrete recommendations for improvement or development. Actionable Feedback in 360-Degree Reviews helps individuals understand exactly what they need to do to enhance their performance, interpersonal skills, or leadership abilities.
The 360-Degree Feedback Process typically involves several key steps: defining the purpose and goals of the review, selecting participants, designing the feedback tool (including questions and rating scales), collecting and analyzing the feedback, and finally, delivering the feedback to the employee in a constructive manner.
To ensure the effectiveness of the 360-Degree Feedback process, organizations should clearly communicate the purpose and confidentiality of the process, provide training on how to give and receive feedback constructively, and follow up on the feedback with actionable development plans and support for personal growth.
Category Tags
ManagementMONTHLY NEWSLETTER:
Subscribe and join our community of curious HR Professionals and Managers.
7675 Blvd Saint-Laurent,
suite 201,
Montreal, QC,
CA, H2R 1W9
7675 Blvd Saint-Laurent, suite 201, Montreal, QC, CA, H2R 1W9
Contact us
1 833 277 5289
Contact us | 1 833 277 5289
Follow us on LinkedIn:
© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved